Search Preview
What Is Neuroplasticity? | Urban Retreat Center
urbanretreat.centerThursday, December 10, 2009 By Mark Roth, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Scientists used to think that the structure of the human brain didn't change much after infancy. But in the past 20 years, there has been an explosion of studies showing just how adaptable and malleable the human brain is, and one of the most intriguing was published today by Carnegie Mellon University
.center > urbanretreat.center
SEO audit: Content analysis
Language | Error! No language localisation is found. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
Title | What Is Neuroplasticity? | Urban Retreat Center | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Text / HTML ratio | 28 % | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Frame | Excellent! The website does not use iFrame solutions. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Flash | Excellent! The website does not have any flash contents. | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords cloud | brain human Retreat Retreats Skip improve brains connections whitematter grew skills children readers poor instruction reading remedial intensive months | ||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Keywords consistency |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Headings |
|
||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||||
Images | We found 1 images on this web page. |
SEO Keywords (Single)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density |
---|---|---|
brain | 3 | 0.15 % |
3 | 0.15 % | |
human | 2 | 0.10 % |
Retreat | 2 | 0.10 % |
Retreats | 2 | 0.10 % |
Skip | 1 | 0.05 % |
improve | 1 | 0.05 % |
brains | 1 | 0.05 % |
connections | 1 | 0.05 % |
whitematter | 1 | 0.05 % |
grew | 1 | 0.05 % |
skills | 1 | 0.05 % |
children | 1 | 0.05 % |
readers | 1 | 0.05 % |
poor | 1 | 0.05 % |
instruction | 1 | 0.05 % |
reading | 1 | 0.05 % |
remedial | 1 | 0.05 % |
intensive | 1 | 0.05 % |
months | 1 | 0.05 % |
SEO Keywords (Two Word)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density |
---|---|---|
in the | 2 | 0.10 % |
of the | 2 | 0.10 % |
the human | 2 | 0.10 % |
human brain | 2 | 0.10 % |
Skip to | 1 | 0.05 % |
reading instruction | 1 | 0.05 % |
instruction children | 1 | 0.05 % |
children who | 1 | 0.05 % |
who had | 1 | 0.05 % |
had been | 1 | 0.05 % |
readers were | 1 | 0.05 % |
been poor | 1 | 0.05 % |
poor readers | 1 | 0.05 % |
intensive remedial | 1 | 0.05 % |
were not | 1 | 0.05 % |
not only | 1 | 0.05 % |
only able | 1 | 0.05 % |
able to | 1 | 0.05 % |
remedial reading | 1 | 0.05 % |
of intensive | 1 | 0.05 % |
SEO Keywords (Three Word)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
---|---|---|---|
the human brain | 2 | 0.10 % | No |
Skip to main | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
who had been | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
of intensive remedial | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
intensive remedial reading | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
remedial reading instruction | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
reading instruction children | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
instruction children who | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
children who had | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
been poor readers | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
had been poor | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
six months of | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
poor readers were | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
readers were not | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
were not only | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
not only able | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
only able to | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
able to improve | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
months of intensive | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
just six months | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
SEO Keywords (Four Word)
Keyword | Occurrence | Density | Possible Spam |
---|---|---|---|
Skip to main content | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
who had been poor | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
months of intensive remedial | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
of intensive remedial reading | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
intensive remedial reading instruction | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
remedial reading instruction children | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
reading instruction children who | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
instruction children who had | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
children who had been | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
had been poor readers | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
just six months of | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
been poor readers were | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
poor readers were not | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
readers were not only | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
were not only able | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
not only able to | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
only able to improve | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
able to improve their | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
six months of intensive | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
after just six months | 1 | 0.05 % | No |
Internal links in - urbanretreat.center
Ongoing Classes | Urban Retreat Center
Retreats | Urban Retreat Center
Frequently Asked Questions | Urban Retreat Center
User account | Urban Retreat Center
Catalog | Urban Retreat Center
What Is Neuroplasticity? | Urban Retreat Center
Frequently Asked Questions | Urban Retreat Center
Urbanretreat.center Spined HTML
What Is Neuroplasticity? | Urban Retreat Center Skip to main content Urban Retreat Center Toggle navigation Classes Retreats FAQ Login Pay Call for an interview.(520) 770-1200 You are hereHome What Is Neuroplasticity? Thursday, December 10, 2009 By Mark Roth, Pittsburgh Post-Gazette Scientists used to think that the structure of the human smart-ass didn't transpiration much without infancy. But in the past 20 years, there has been an explosion of studies showing just how unsteadfast and malleable the human smart-ass is, and one of the most intriguing was published today by Carnegie Mellon University scientists. Writing in the periodical Neuron, smart-ass researchers Marcel Just and Timothy Keller said that without just six months of intensive remedial reading instruction, children who had been poor readers were not only worldly-wise to modernize their skills, but grew new white-matter connections in their brains. Read more: http://www.post-gazette.com/pg/09344/1019898-115.stm#ixzz0a0AyOIEo Social Links FacebookTwitterPinterestGoogle+Yelp Copyright © 2000 - 2018 Kelley Graham All Rights Reserved. Upcoming Retreats Intro to Standing Meditation - Half Day Retreat 20 Oct 2018 - 1:30pm to 4:30pm